Rahul Gandhi, Prashant Kishor & Ashok Lavassa among those targeted for NSO-Pegasus surveillance which has drawn attention of UN

Pegasus disclosure

After the scandalous exposures on Rafale deal and tax row on Cairn energy (where Indian assets were frozen on the order of French tribunal), the Pegasus surveillance exposure comes to haunt the BJP-led centre.

Paris-based media non-profit Forbidden Stories and Amnesty International accessed the leaked database on the Pegasus surveillance issue. The disclosure included a list of phone numbers targeted by Pegasus spyware of NSO Corporation at the behest of its clients (obviously governments). The Pegasus surveillance report reflected that there were hundreds of Indian phone numbers among the target people whom the clients of NSO had fixed for surveillance. The clients in India who allowed NSO (the firm that designed Pegasus spyware) to target Indians have gone well beyond the stated objectives of countering terrorism and other serious crimes. Among the phones of the Indians targeted, five belonged to journalists and one belonged to a high level political adviser working for non-BJP parties. Forensic analyses were performed on 22 smartphones in India, whose numbers appeared on the disclosed list. Out of them 10 were targeted by Pegasus with seven of them successfully infected with the spyware.

Also See: Cyber warfare from China-part-II

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, former Chief election commissioner Ashok Lavassa, poll-strategist Prashant Kishor, Mamata Banerjee’s nephew Abhishek Banerjee are among the people who were put under surveillance under the Pegasus programme. These names are a part of a cache of around 1000 names out of which around 300 have been verified. As Rahul Gandhi had changed his phone, it was not conclusively established whether the Pegasus was deployed on his phone. But, the disclosure report stated that attempts to deploy the spyware were made between mid-2018 to mid-2019, a time window when the nation was gearing up for the general elections of 2019.

In response to the disclosure, Rahul Gandhi said, “Targeted surveillance of the type you describe whether in regard to me, other leaders of the opposition or indeed any law-abiding citizen of India is illegal and deplorable.”
Among other prominent targets, Pegasus Surveillance was placed on people close to Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who was murdered in October 2018 while visiting the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, Turkey. Khashoggi’s body was then dismembered.

Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Hungary, India, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Morocco, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are the ten countries where majority of numbers were identified in clusters in Pegasus deployment. Citizen Lab is a digital surveillance research organisation based out of the University of Toronto. In the past, each of the above-mentioned ten countries has been identified by experts of Citizen Lab that has laid the groundwork for WhatsApp’s 2019 lawsuit against the NSO Group. These countries have been region of focus of majority of operators of Pegasus.

Also Read: People are still being arrested over a scrapped law, observed Supreme Court

Reactions on the Pegasus disclosure have come from top echelons of UN as well. In a statement, UN rights chief Michelle Bachelet said, “The reports about the Pegasus spyware “confirm the urgent need to better regulate the sale, transfer and use of surveillance technology and ensure strict oversight and authorisation”. She described the revelations as “extremely alarming”. She stated that they “seem to confirm some of the worst fears about the potential misuse of surveillance technology.”

The UN high commissioner for Human rights recalled that the UN had repeatedly flagged the dangers of authorities using surveillance tools to hack phones and computers of legitimate journalists, activists and political opponents in the name of public safety.

The Chilean politician who heads the UNHRC said, “Use of surveillance software has been linked to arrest, intimidation and even killings of journalists and human rights defenders.” She also warned that broad use of such technologies could lead to self-censorship.

Bachelet said that surveillance measures can only be justified “in narrowly defined circumstances, with a legitimate goal” such as “investigations into serious crimes and grave security threats.”

She stated with concern, “If the recent allegations about the use of Pegasus are even partly true, then that red line has been crossed again and again with total impunity.”

The UN rights commissioner further said that companies involved in developing and distributing surveillance technologies should ensure their technologies are not used to violate human rights.

Also Read: What can India learn from the Tenth man principle?

The NSO clients based in India (suspicions are now towards people in government and specifically BJP) have technically committed a huge offence under the Indian telegraph Act 1885 and the IT Act 2000. The legislations of Indian Telegraph Act and Information Technology Act prescribe procedures that must be followed for lawful interception. Different countries have different laws pertaining to define such offences. But the use of hacking to deliver surveillance spyware in India by any individual, private or official, is an offence under the IT Act 2000.

The Pegasus is a spyware that can be planted in phones of people whom the government or any agency or corporation wants to put under surveillance. The spyware is developed by the NSO Corporation, a telecommunication tech company based in Herzliya, Israel. NSO stands for Niv, Shalev and Omri, named after the three founders of the company. The company claims that it provides authorized governments with technology that helps them combat terror and crime. The website of the firm reads that the technology of NSO is designed by telecommunications and intelligence experts who, positioned at the forefront of their fields are dedicated to keeping pace with the ever-changing cyber world. The details on the Pegasus surveillance was shared with Le Monde, The Guardian, Washington Post, Die Zeit, Suddeutsche Zeitung, The Wire from India and 10 other Mexican, Arab and European news organisations as part of a collaborative investigation called the ‘Pegasus Project’.

Prashant Kishor & Amarinder Singh meeting amid power rivalry- raises speculation

PK Amarinder

On Wednesday, Punjab Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh met political strategist Prashant Kishor at Kapurthala House, the CM’s residence in Delhi. He met the strategist a day after meeting AICC chief Sonia Gandhi. In political circles in Punjab, the meeting has raised eyebrows and is stirring speculations.

Kishor had come to Punjab during the recent Assembly elections in a few states, including West Bengal. He was appointed principal adviser by the Amarinder. But, immediately after the results, PK had expressed his intentions to hang up his boots as a political strategist.

The camp of supporters of Amarinder Singh in Punjab was elated at the meeting. The meeting took place amid a power rivalry and political feud between Amarinder Singh and Navjot Singh Sidhu. The PK-Amarinder Singh meeting also came when a banner of revolt has been raised by several other party members.

Also Read: Can Indian National Congress afford to have twin centres of power in Punjab?

In Punjab Congress, grumbles and rumblings for a demand in change of leadership have also been reported in the recent past. A few leaders, considered close to Amarinder, said that Kishor’s “apparent interest in Punjab” was enough to give the CM’s camp a new lease of life after the party was hit by a “damaging” internal crisis.

Sources in Punjab Congress have said that the strategist was determined not to take up any assignment to strategize for any political leaders.

Also Read: When an ally becomes an adversary- Prashant Kishor and BJP from national election to state elections

A source close to Prashant Kishor said, “What if he has met the chief minister? The CM is personally known to him. He wanted to meet and Kishor was in Delhi. So, he met him.”

The source further added, “Kishor has publicly announced that he has quit this work he used to do. There is no change in his position.”

Earlier most of the MLAs in Punjab have been against signing up Kishor. But, the Chief Minister’s camp is now keen that he takes up assignment with Amarinder.

Also Read: Presence of Prashant Kishor in the state electoral polities across India

A party leader who did not wish to be named, said, “Kishor is now more important in the game of perception. If he is seen with the CM, it gives out an impression that the CM is in saddle firmly, and the challenge by Sidhu does not mean anything.”

Sources said that Prashant Kishor has been calling up leaders in Punjab, stating that the situation in Punjab Congress was very confusing and he was not able to make out what to do. A leader said, “He has been calling up many ministers and saying he was not interested and would not come to the state.”

Prashant Kishor stated that a key battle for democracy would be fought in West Bengal & that Bengal only wants its own daughter

Schedule for the first set of major elections in India (Assam, WB, TN, Kerala, Puducherry) has been announced by the Election Commission in what the CEC called his last press conference. West Bengal Assembly polls would be a testing ground for the saffron camp to drive its polarization & sloganeering campaign and the Trinamool congress to weather the challenges of intra-party factionalism to head into its third-term.

As the electoral battle-ground heats up in West Bengal, Prashant Kishor shared TMC’s main slogan “Bengal wants its daughter” on Twitter, and reiterated a challenge that he laid down to the BJP in December, that if the opposition party crossed the double-digit mark he would “quit this space”.

Also See: Would West Bengal election really be a three-way fight after the defections?

Mr. Kishor’s company, I-PAC is assisting Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in her bid to stop the BJP which is trying to make inroads in the state.

“One of the key battles FOR DEMOCRACY in India will be fought in West Bengal, and the people of Bengal are ready with their MESSAGE and determined to show the RIGHT CARD – #BanglaNijerMeyekeiChay (Bengal Only Wants its Own Daughter) PS: On 2nd May, hold me to my last tweet,” he wrote.

Also See: What are the problem areas of TMC and the chances of BJP in this election season in West Bengal

On December 21 Mr. Kishor had tweeted: “For all the hype AMPLIFIED by a section of supportive media, in reality BJP will struggle to CROSS DOUBLE DIGITS in #WestBengal PS: Please save this tweet and if BJP does any better I must quit this space!”

Also Read: When an ally becomes an adversary- Prashant Kishor and BJP from national election to state elections

West Bengal elections will be held in eight phases from March 27 to April 29, the Election Commission announced on Friday, making it the longest ever polls in the state. The results will be declared on May 2. The eight days of voting are March 27, April 1, April 6, April 10, April 17, April 22, April 26, and April 29. Last time, in 2016, the state’s 6.5 crore voters voted over seven days between April and May.

When an ally becomes an adversary- Prashant Kishor and BJP from national election to state elections

Niccolo Machiavelli was a famous philosopher, a political theorist who authored the famous book-The Prince, and a prominent Italian renaissance diplomat. He is known to have quoted once-“Hence it comes about that all armed Prophets have been victorious, and all unarmed Prophets have been destroyed”.

Far away from the country of birth of Machiavelli, in India, an oriental country, Machiavellianism is the central inevitable feature of the electoral battles.

In the upcoming state elections in India, like in West Bengal & Tamil Nadu, political parties have their own sets of prophets, with all of them armed with some specific strengths which would be relevant in the context of the election. But, there is one player in all these elections, who is carrying the proverbial magic wand, or so to speak, given the importance of the state elections in Indian federalism, and the background of that person, in terms of his work across elections.

In the season leading upto the first major state election in India, the ruling party in West Bengal has seen many leaders like Suvendu AdhikariRajeeb Banerjee & others resigning with most of them joining BJP. This has led to an idea taking shape in the political circles in Kolkata and New Delhi, which is that the election battle in West Bengal is shaping up as a fight between Prashant Kishor and Amit Shah apart from being an ideological tiff between Mamata and Modi.

That decision-making in Trinamool Congress high command has been centralized around Mamata, her nephew Abhishek Banerjee and Prashant Kishor has been a source of disgruntlement and disillusionment among many senior party leaders, is not a secret. This has caused various leaders like Suvendu Adhikari, a prominent erstwhile leader of TMC in East Midnapore, Barrackpore MLA Silbhadra Datta, Coochbehar South MLA Mihir Goswami to get disaffected in TMC-fold and jump the boat into BJP. They have accused that they have been isolated and cut-off from the policy, strategy and decision-making, which have gone into the organizational fort of Prashant Kishor. Leaders close to the high command in TMC have rubbished these allegations as means to make scapegoat out of Prashant Kishor.

Also See: What are the problem areas of TMC and the chances of BJP in this election season in West Bengal

While giving strategic direction to the TMC in the upcoming state election West Bengal, Prashant Kishor had on December 21, last year tweeted that that BJP would struggle to cross double digits in the state election, which had whipped up the political storm in the state and in the national circles of observers of BJP’s approaches to state election. Kishor had also added a note that if BJP defies his prediction, then he would quit. BJP national general secretary Kailash Vijayvargya had then commented that India would be a better place with one political analyst less. He had also at one point of time stated that Amit Shah is the principal of the college where Kishor was a student. That had led many to portray the Bengal electoral battle as being a tactical battle between Shah and Kishor apart from being an ideological battle between Modi and Mamata. But the Kishor-BJP oppositional equation goes well beyond the Shah-Kishor countering dynamics.

After having worked in UNICEF’ s Africa unit, Kishor was embedded into the BJP wing, which was campaigning in Gujarat for the assembly election of 2012. It was because of a write-up of Kishor as an UN expert official on the water scarcity situation in Gujarat, that BJP decided to bring him onboard to design the policy & campaign for the party running for the Gujarat polls.

Also See: Would West Bengal election really be a three-way fight after the defections?

Before designing various state election campaigns for various non-BJP parties, Kishor had taken the charge of designing the national campaign for BJP for the 2014 LS polls. As per Pawan Verma, a former adviser to CM of Bihar-Nitish Kumar, Kishor had trained Modi how to deal with uncomfortable questions from journalists, like what happened in 2007, when he (Modi) was interviewed by Karan Thapar. In that interview, which is generally avoided by the BJP-supporters as a blip on pre-2014 political timeline, Karan Thapar’s questions had choked Modi to such an extent that he had to leave the interview.

When Kishor was giving shape to the national campaign for BJP in the 2014 LS election, he had suggested that the new government should build an advisory body, which would bring in experts from the private enterprises to guide the government policies, somewhat similar to what is done in the US. This advice was not heeded by the new government under BJP. (The NITI Aayog is nothing but a rejigged version of Planning commission, which prepares favourable reports for GOI at best.) That led to the fallout of Kishor with the BJP and he left the advisory team. Some say that he had in fact left because of his friction with Amit Shah.

After his departure from BJP-team, he and other members of Citizens for Accountable Governance (founded by him in 2013), which was central in the national election campaign for 2014 polls, reorganized into I-PAC in 2015.

I-PAC or Indian Political Action Committee developed as a professional platform for helping the political parties design their election campaigns. The body has been responsible for victories of many non-BJP parties in state elections, like Arvind Kejriwal’s Aam Admi Party in Delhi in 2020, Jaganmohan Reddy’s YSR Congress in Andhra Pradesh in 2019, Congress in Punjab in 2017, & Nitish Kumar’s Janta Dal (United) in 2015 in Bihar. The only speck of failure on the super-successful portfolio of I-PAC has been the campaign for INC in the UP election of 2017.

Also Read: Presence of Prashant Kishor in the state electoral polities across India

Apart from election campaigns, the I-PAC has been involved in outreach programmes in various states like West Bengal and Tamil Nadu. According to the DMK, the purpose of ‘Ondrinaivom Vaa’ campaign, conceptualized by I-PAC-TN unit, is “to act as a catalyst to bring together the people of Tamil Nadu”, especially during the Covid19 situation. In West Bengal, TMC rolled out Didir Doot App on February 4. The App is a brainchild of Prashant Kishor, or PK as he is affectionately called in TMC high commands. The app has sections like Didir Sathe Kaj Karun (Work with Didi, work for Bengal), Didir Sathe Jukto Thakun (work together with Didi) and Didir Kotha Janun (Get the most recent information on Didi and her campaigns). TMC led by Mamata Banerjee has claimed that the Didir Doot App has over 1 lakh downloads. The Didir Doot App is known to be giving a tough fight to the Modipara App developed by the BJP IT cell team for West Bengal led by Amit Malviya. Meanwhile, the subaltern vote bank (SC/ST/OBC) in West Bengal, which is being targeted by the saffron party is being tapped by the I-PAC through interactions with the leaders of this social category. IPAC is also assisting the TMC stand against the BJP’s tornado of advertisements and videos on social media and especially over the WhatsApp. From providing feedback from the ground to getting regular updates on concerns of voters, I-PAC is also keeping the party’s top leadership updated on various developments over the News and cyberspace. Party leaders stated that Mamata Banerjee is also aware about the BJP troll army’s relentless attack on her, which is targeted to polarize the state.

To counter this, the IPAC teams are also educating district-level leaders about the problems & pitfalls of social media blunders. Booth-level workers are being advised by the teams to attend training sessions on weekends to familiarize themselves with the party’s social media strategy.

As expected, there are critics of the approach taken by the I-PAC in designing the poll campaigns in states like West Bengal and Tamil Nadu.  BJP MP from Darjeeling Raju Bista called out TMC and I-PAC over designing Insider vs Outsider theme, when the chief professional political strategist is himself a non- Bengali. The tension in the saffron camp with respect to Darjeeling can be understood given that Bimal Gurung, leader of Gorkha Janmukti Morcha who had for long supported BJP switched side to TMC last year.  The Darjeeling region has seen stability from 2011 onwards, when the TMC- INC coalition came to power at Kolkata. But, the Gorkhaland issue has occasionally seen a resurgence, which is being tapped by the BJP to gain & expand ground in the North Bengal political platform. The Darjeeling seat has been with the BJP from 2009 onwards, but from late 2020 there has been a simmering doubt whether it will retain this LS seat. Few days back, the efforts of BJP got a shot in the arms when few leaders from GJM switched to the saffron camp. But, this does not do away the challenge presented by Prashant Kishor to BJP.

The main problem which BJP faces is that Prashant Kishor, who is the driving force behind the state election campaigns for almost all non-BJP parties, has seen the internal functioning of the saffron camp. He is an ‘ally turned guide for the adversaries’ from the point of view of the BJP.  It would be, therefore wrong to extrapolate the impact of the defections from the TMC on the total outcome of the impending election in West Bengal this year.

Prashant Kishor knows what exact social frequencies the BJP works on, which more or less revolve around populism, religious nationalism and you vs us divide. Hence, Prashant giving the suitable antidotes to the BJP’s agenda in the state elections is causing a headache for the saffron party which is already cornered on the farmers’ protests and suppression of the rightful voices of dissent.

Prashant Kishor throws taunts at Nitish Kumar over lackluster nominated government

Prashant_Kishor

After the recently concluded Bihar polls, Prashant Kishor and Tejashwi Yadav had delivered a stinging congratulatory message to Nitish Kumar, describing him as a “nominated” chief minister.

Once a close aide of Nitish Kumar, Prashant Kishor was made the JD(U) vice president by the party chief, but his independent and often adversarial views soured their relations and he was expelled from the party. Kishor, as the political strategist had worked closely with Nitish Kumar during the 2015 assembly elections before they fell out earlier this year. He tweeted his congratulatory message to the Bihar chief minister as soon as he started his fourth straight term.

Kumar took oath as chief minister on November 16 afternoon after the Bharatiya Janata Party decided to stick with Nitish Kumar despite the less than impressive performance of the Janata Dal United in the just-concluded assembly elections.

Nitish Kumar’s party, once considered the senior partner in the ruling Bihar alliance, won only 43 seats in the 243-member assembly, in contrast to the BJP’s 74 seats. The depleted strength of the JDU in the assembly is reflected in the composition of the council of ministers that was sworn-in with Kumar. The BJP has seven ministers in Nitish Kumar’s team as compared to five ministers from the JDU. One cabinet berth each has gone to the smaller allies, Hindustani Awam Morcha (HAM) and Vikas-sheel Insaan Party (VIP)

“Congratulations to Nitish Kumar for taking oath as the BJP-nominated chief minister,” tweeted Prashant Kishor, an effort to underline Nitish Kumar’s dependence on the BJP.

“With a tired and politically belittled leader as CM, Bihar should brace for (a) few more years of lackluster governance,” Prashant Kishor said in a tweet that appeared to echo the campaign pitch of the opposition.

Through the campaigning, Rashtriya Janata Dal’s Tejashwi Yadav who led the Grand Alliance of opposition parties, or Mahagathbandhan, had put Nitish Kumar’s 15 years as Bihar chief minister at the heart of its pitch. Tejashwi Yadav, in an attempt to dent the public perception about Kumar, would frequently claim that Nitish Kumar was tired as an administrator.

Prashant Kishor had strategized for Nitish Kumar ahead of the 2015 elections when arch-rivals JDU, RJD, and Congress had come together to form a grand alliance to stop the BJP from coming to power. Nitish Kumar walked out of this alliance in 2017 when he pole-vaulted into the BJP’s camp, accusing Tejashwi Yadav, his deputy from the RJD, of corruption. This switch had ejected Tejashwi Yadav from the treasury benches in the assembly to the opposition but the 31-year-old had promptly hit the ground running in his new role, campaigning against Nitish Kumar. Tejashwi Yadav’s RJD, which had emerged as the single largest party in the state elections, was projected to be within striking distance of power by most exit polls.

Yadav had tweeted his congratulations to Nitish Kumar, stressing that he had been nominated as chief minister. He also added that he hoped that Nitish Kumar would, instead of struggling to retain the chief minister’s chair, give priority to delivering on the NDA’s promise of 19 lakh jobs, education, health, and irrigation.

The author is a student member of Amity centre of Happiness